diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'benchmarks/dc11.dat')
| -rw-r--r-- | benchmarks/dc11.dat | 409 |
1 files changed, 409 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/benchmarks/dc11.dat b/benchmarks/dc11.dat new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ec8c5be --- /dev/null +++ b/benchmarks/dc11.dat @@ -0,0 +1,409 @@ +BEGIN NEW DATA CASE
+C BENCHMARK DC-11
+C Illustration of data input using [Y]. Matrix comes from DC-9 (or
+C more precisely, DCPRINT-25, since DIAGNOSTIC is needed to see it).
+C Solution is close to DC-9 (remember limited input [Y] precision).
+C Note two $UNITS cards. The 2nd, returning to original XOPT and
+C COPT, does nothing, since all data input is completed. But the 1st
+C is mandatory whenever [Y] input is used, so input [Y] in mhos will
+C be loaded into List-3 tables TR and TX without any scaling. COPT is
+C not used, so it can be anything (zero is used below). But XOPT must
+C equal the reciprocal of 2 * Pi, since the scaling factor for [L] is
+C 2 * Pi times this frequency (.1591549431) in Hz --- which is unity.
+C There are 5 stacked subcases. The 4th & 5th are related to this 1st.
+ 0.0 0.0 60. { Note XOPT = 60 here --- never actually used
+ 1 1
+C New XOPT, COPT = 1.59154943E-01 0.00000000E+00 |$UNITS, .1591549431, 0.0,
+C 1st of coupled R-L. 4.80000E-09 1.22811E-04 |51RA1 GA1 4
+C -1.000E-07-2.242E-05 9.440E-03-2.574E-02 9.440E-03|52RB1 GB1 -
+C 4.300E-08-1.463E-05-8.500E-03 1.673E-02 1.660E-02|53RC1 GC1 4
+C -1.000E-07-9.426E-06 1.871E-02-5.030E-02-1.450E-02|54 -
+C 4.631E-02-1.156E-02 3.250E-03-8.199E-02 4.631E-02| .
+C 1.500E-06 6.459E-06-1.680E-02 5.972E-02 1.897E-02|55 1
+C -3.270E-02 3.048E-02 3.607E-02-6.062E-02 3.607E-02| -
+C 1.200E-06 4.486E-06 2.090E-03-2.063E-02-2.200E-03|56 1
+C 3.660E-03-6.532E-02-2.000E-05 2.742E-02 4.850E-03| .
+C New XOPT, COPT = 6.00000000E+01 0.00000000E+00 |$UNITS, 60., 0.0, { Restore
+$UNITS, .1591549431, 0.0, { Ensures no scaling of [Y] in mhos. XOPT = 1/(2*Pi)
+51RA1 GA1 4.8E-9 1.22811E-04 { 1st row of 6x6 [Y] in mhos
+52RB1 GB1 -1.E-7-2.24227E-05.00944-2.57399E-02
+53RC1 GC1 4.3E-8-1.46254E-05-.0085 1.67291E-02.01660-4.74760E-02
+54 -1.E-7-9.42642E-06.01871-5.03015E-02-.0145 2.40976E-02
+ .04631-1.15612E-02
+55 1.5E-6 6.45897E-06-.0168 5.97172E-02.01897-4.24556E-02
+ -.0327 3.04757E-02.03607-6.06204E-02
+56 1.2E-6 4.48565E-06.00209-2.06269E-02-.0022 3.68953E-02
+ .00366-6.53239E-02-2.E-5 2.74250E-02.00485 9.93931E-03
+$UNITS, 60., 0.0, { Restore original values; "CIMAGE" ends scaling XUNITS = 1.
+BLANK card ending branch cards
+BLANK card ending non-existent switch cards
+14GA1 424.35 60. 0.0 -.1
+14RA1 424.35 60. 10.0 -.1
+14GB1 424.35 60. -120.0 -.1
+14RB1 424.35 60. -110.0 -.1
+14GC1 424.35 60. 120.0 -.1
+14RC1 424.35 60. 130.0 -.1
+C --------------+------------------------------
+C From bus name | Names of all adjacent busses.
+C --------------+------------------------------
+C RA1 |GA1 *
+C GA1 |RA1 *
+C RB1 |GB1 *
+C GB1 |RB1 *
+C RC1 |GC1 *
+C GC1 |RC1 *
+C --------------+------------------------------
+BLANK card ending source cards
+C Total network loss P-loss by summing injections = 9.326316227367E+03
+C End injection: -12.96755041034 44.410354381177 -6429.033843309 9422.7669408263
+C End injection: -42.47495983067 -106.9773628 -6888.835943954 -0.6822873
+-5RA1 GA1 RB1 GB1 { Mar, 95. Illustrate 2 phasor branch voltage outputs
+BLANK card ending output requests
+ PRINTER PLOT
+BLANK card ending non-existent plot cards
+BEGIN NEW DATA CASE
+C 2nd of 5 subcases will illustrate the request for an exact Pi-equivalent
+C to represent constant-parameter distributed lines in the phasor solution.
+C Data is from BENCHMARK DCPRINT-1, from which the permanently-closed switch
+C was removed to simplify. The solution is just a little different. To see
+C this, look at generator inject (compare with following lumped-R solution):
+C SEND 100. 100. 1.1985672173179 1.9672525544427
+C 0.0 0.0 -1.559974114699 -52.4640241
+C Acknowledgement: Bob Meredith of New York Power Authority inspired the
+C work of this feature by his studies involving phasor
+C solutions at high frequencies (200 KHz) for power system
+C carrier relaying. Bob found that using lumped R modeling
+C gave quite erroneous results. WSM. March 25, 1989
+EXACT PHASOR EQUIVALENT { Switch from lumped-R to exact Pi-equiv. of distributed
+PRINTED NUMBER WIDTH, 13, 2, { Request maximum precision (for 8 output columns)
+ .000100 .020 60. 60.
+ 1 1 1 1 1 -1
+ 2 1 5 5 20 20
+ REC .001 { Near short at receiving end to ground } 3
+-1SEND REC 0.3 0.4 12.6 100. { 1-phase distributed line
+BLANK card ending branch cards
+BLANK card ending switch cards
+14SEND 100. 60. { 60-Hz phasor solution } -1.
+BLANK card ending source cards
+C SEND 100. 100. 1.2001187442482 1.966491078825
+C 0.0 0.0 -1.557819682377 -52.3899333
+C REC .00119991725341 .00201685894214 -1.199917253405 2.0168589421448
+C -.001621085617 -53.4913908 1.6210856169526 126.5086092
+C Total network loss P-loss by summing injections = 6.000593721241E+01
+C Solution at nodes with known voltage. Nodes that are shorted together by swi
+C SEND 100. 100. 1.2001187442482 1.966491078825
+C 0.0 0.0 -1.557819682377 -52.3899333
+C Step Time REC REC SEND REC
+C TERRA TERRA
+C 0 0.0 .0011999173 .0011999173 100. 1.199917253
+C 1 .1E-3 .0012601784 .0012601784 99.92894726 1.260178379
+C 2 .2E-3 .0013186574 .0013186574 99.71589003 1.318657447
+C 3 .3E-3 .0013752626 .0013752626 99.36113105 1.375262631
+ 1 { Request the output of all (here, only two) node voltages
+C 200 .02 .0019139029 .0019139029 30.90169944 1.913902913
+C Variable maxima : .0020181823 .0020181823 100. 2.018182282
+C Times of maxima : .0025 .0025 0.0 .0025
+C Variable minima : -.002017382 -.002017382 -99.9921044 -2.01738187
+C Times of minima : .0108 .0108 .0083 .0108
+ PRINTER PLOT
+C If lumped R, the extrema change just a little: (-2.017, 2.017)
+ 194 4. 0.0 20. REC { Axis limits : (-2.017, 2.018)
+$WIDTH, 80, { To compact the case-summary tables, switch to narrow output
+BLANK card ending plot cards
+BEGIN NEW DATA CASE
+C 3rd of 5 subcases is unrelated to the preceding two. It will illustrate
+C the use of EMTP to perform both single-phase and 3-phase faults to ground.
+C The network is copied from DC-3. Usage began the 1st week of March, 1993.
+$WIDTH, 132, { More than 80 columns are needed to see the 3-phase fault table
+FAULTS TO GROUND { Declaration of intention to run a phasor fault study
+ M-A M-B M-C { 1st fault is 3-phase; we will short these nodes to ground
+ 1-A 1-B 1-C { 2nd fault is 3-phase. Etc. FORMAT is (2X, 13A6) with
+ 2-A 2-B 2-C { blank field ignored (names are on left only to look nice).
+ 4-A 4-B 4-C { There is one line per fault, which can involve a maximum
+ 7-A 7-B 7-C { of 13 nodes.
+ 11-A 11-B 11-C 2-A { 6th fault is 4-phase, to illustrate no limit < 14
+C Keep the 7th fault 3-phase. However, spread it over 2 data cards as an
+C illustration of CONT. on the right edge. The former limit of 13 nodes
+C per fault thus is expanded to 25 on 18 August 2005. The number of faults
+C becomes unlimited at this time as SUBROUTINE FAULT is reprogrammed. WSM.
+C 18-A 18-B 18-C { 7th fault is 3-phase
+ 18-A 18-B CONT.
+ 18-C { 7th fault is spread over 2 data cards by continuation request
+ 18-A { 8th fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-A is shorted).
+ 18-B { 9th fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-B is shorted).
+ 18-C { 10 fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-A is shorted).
+C For 1, 2, ... 6 phases, it is possible to pack the fault names on input
+C data cards. So, for example, there can be up to 13 single-phase faults,
+C up to six 2-phase faults, up to four 3-phase faults, up to two 5- or 6-phase
+C faults. For any one card, the 2 or more faults must be for the same number
+C of phases --- the number that is declared on a ?-phase faults follow card
+C that precedes it. The declared number of phases remains in effect until
+C altered by another such declaration or End packing of 2 or more faults (to
+C return to original, unpacked format). On any packed fault card, any one of
+C the 2 or more data fields can be left blank. But not all can be left blank
+C as this would serve to terminate the list of faults. So, an illustration.
+C Let's repeat the 8th, 9th, and 10th faults immediately above. The preceding
+C 3 separate cards can be replaced by the following packed, higher-level
+C equivalent which is added by WSM on 19 August 2005 :
+6-phase faults follow { Declare packing of 6-phase fault names, 2 per card
+C In fact, no 6-phase fault will be illustrated, however. Think smaller:
+1-phase faults follow { Declare packing of 1-phase fault names, 13 per card
+ 18-A 18-B 18-C { 11th, 12th, and 13th faults each are single-phase
+C 7-phase faults follow { Illegal declaration of packing of 7-phase fault names
+C The preceding halts execution, unfortunately, so it must be commented out.
+End packing of 2 or more faults { Declare end of such card packing
+ 7-A 7-B 7-C { 14th fault is 3-phase to ground, identical to the 5th.
+C Finally, illustrate the limit of 25 phases. This 15th fault is legal:
+ 18-A 18-B 17-A 17-B 16-A 16-B 15-A 15-B 14-A 14-B 13-A 13-B CONT.
+ 12-A 12-B 11-A 11-B 10-A 10-B 9-A 9-B 8-A 8-B 7-A 7-B 6-A
+BLANK card ends list of faults (more accurately, nodes to be faulted to ground)
+ .000050 .010 3000. { DELTAT and TMAX of this card will be ignored
+ 1 1 1 1 1 { All these integers will be ignored
+ 1M-A 1-A 34.372457.68.15781
+ 2M-B 1-B 35.735164.43-.031538.002451.79.16587
+ 3M-C 1-C 35.735164.43-.031537.455151.72-.021938.002451.79.16587
+ 11-A 2-A M-A 1-A { Sections 2 through 18 are copies of the first
+ 21-B 2-B { which has just been inputted.
+ 31-C 2-C
+C The following $LISTOFF and $LISTON are used to illustrate operation of
+C this valuable feature within fault studies. One 3-phase Pi-circuit, from
+C node 2 to node 3, will be missing in the output.
+$LISTOFF
+ 12-A 3-A M-A 1-A
+ 22-B 3-B
+ 32-C 3-C
+$LISTON
+ 13-A 4-A M-A 1-A
+ 23-B 4-B
+ 33-C 4-C
+ 14-A 5-A M-A 1-A
+ 24-B 5-B
+ 34-C 5-C
+ 15-A 6-A M-A 1-A
+ 25-B 6-B
+ 35-C 6-C
+ 16-C 7-C M-A 1-A { Note transposition: /C/A/B/ rather than /A/B/C
+ 26-A 7-A
+ 36-B 7-B
+ 17-C 8-C M-A 1-A
+ 27-A 8-A
+ 37-B 8-B
+ 18-C 9-C M-A 1-A
+ 28-A 9-A
+ 38-B 9-B
+ 19-C 10-C M-A 1-A
+ 29-A 10-A
+ 39-B 10-B
+ 110-C 11-C M-A 1-A
+ 210-A 11-A
+ 310-B 11-B
+ 111-C 12-C M-A 1-A
+ 211-A 12-A
+ 311-B 12-B
+ 112-B 13-B M-A 1-A { Note 2nd transposition: /B/C/A/ rather than /C/A/B
+ 212-C 13-C
+ 312-A 13-A
+ 113-B 14-B M-A 1-A
+ 213-C 14-C
+ 313-A 14-A
+ 114-B 15-B M-A 1-A
+ 214-C 15-C
+ 314-A 15-A
+ 115-B 16-B M-A 1-A
+ 215-C 16-C
+ 315-A 16-A
+ 116-B 17-B M-A 1-A
+ 216-C 17-C
+ 316-A 17-A
+ 117-B 18-B M-A 1-A
+ 217-C 18-C
+ 317-A 18-A
+$BEGIN PL4 COMMENTS
+C Copy the structure as illustrated in DC-3. Prior to 10 June 2004, this
+C data would produce an error halt because FTG required 2 cells in CIMAGE
+C for each fault. This is for fixed KRDPL4(10). After 5 faults, the 10
+C cells would be filled. The complaint came from Anders Johnson, working
+C with Dan Goldsworthy at BPA. Data was received 4 June 2004. Anders put
+C his comment in the middle of his branch data. Curiously, if location was
+C moved to the top (immediately after BNDC), the problem disappears. But it
+C is simpler to protect against all locations by having FTP code of SUBR1 set
+C KOMPL4 = 0 as each new fault begins. This standard test case is modified
+C on 11 June 2004 to illustrate the problem for any executable version that
+C was created prior to 10 June 2004. Note that ICAT of the integer misc.
+C data card remains zero (unchanged). It is the use of PL4 comments that
+C caused the problem, whether or not the user requested a .PL4 file to
+C receive them. Except for this new data block in this one location, data
+C is unchanged from the old DC-11, which had MS-DOS date 3-24-95.
+$END PL4 COMMENTS
+ 0POLE-AM-A 15.0
+ 0POLE-BM-B 15.0
+ 0POLE-CM-C 15.0
+BLANK card ending branch cards
+ E-A POLE-A -1. 20.0 { 1st of 3 closed switches merely illustrate
+ E-B POLE-B -1. 20.0 { that such switches can coexist with this
+ E-C POLE-C -1. 20.0 { special usage of FAULTS TO GROUND.
+ 17-A 0.00998 20.0 { 1st of 3 open switches could be omitted
+ 17-B 0.013998 20.0 { without any change to solution. These
+ 17-C 0.013998 20.0 { illustrate a 2nd type of coexistance.
+BLANK card ending switches
+14E-A -1.0 60.0 -90.0 { Note we make T-start < 0 } -1.
+14E-B -1.0 60.0 -210.0 { The fault study is driven} -1.
+14E-C -1.0 60.0 30.0 { by such phasor sources. } -1.
+BLANK card ending sources
+
+ Note: The blank card ending sources is the last that actually will
+ be read and used. When the fault study is complete, the program
+ will skip to the BEGIN NEW DATA CASE card below for any possible
+ following subcase (none for this illustration). So, we can show
+ output here with no need for "C " in columns 1-2. There are two
+ blocks of special output beginning with the interpretation of
+ input data cards:
+
+Request preceding list of nodes to be faulted. |FAULTS TO GROUND { Declaration of intention to run a phasor fault study
+Names of nodes for fault number 1. | M-A M-B M-C { 1st fault is 3-phase; we will short these nodes to ground
+Names of nodes for fault number 2. | 1-A 1-B 1-C { 2nd fault is 3-phase. Etc. FORMAT is (2X, 13A6) with
+Names of nodes for fault number 3. | 2-A 2-B 2-C { blank field ignored (names are on left only to look nice).
+Names of nodes for fault number 4. | 4-A 4-B 4-C { There is one line per fault, which can involve a maximum
+Names of nodes for fault number 5. | 7-A 7-B 7-C { of 13 nodes.
+Names of nodes for fault number 6. | 11-A 11-B 11-C 2-A { 6th fault is 4-phase, to illustrate no limit < 14
+Names of nodes for fault number 7. | 18-A 18-B CONT.
+Names of nodes for fault number 7. | 18-C { 7th fault is spread over 2 data cards by continuation request
+Names of nodes for fault number 8. | 18-A { 8th fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-A is shorted).
+Names of nodes for fault number 9. | 18-B { 9th fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-B is shorted).
+Names of nodes for fault number 10. | 18-C { 10 fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-A is shorted).
+Pack multiple faults on a single input card. |6-phase faults follow { Declare packing of 6-phase fault names, 2 per card
+Pack multiple faults on a single input card. |1-phase faults follow { Declare packing of 1-phase fault names, 13 per card
+Names of nodes for fault number 11. | 18-A 18-B 18-C { 11th, 12th, and 13th faults each are single-phase
+End packing of multiple faults on input cards. |End packing of 2 or more faults { Declare end of such card packing
+Names of nodes for fault number 14. | 7-A 7-B 7-C { 14th fault is 3-phase to ground, identical to the 5th.
+Blank card ending list of nodes to be faulted. |BLANK card ends list of faults (more accurately, nodes to be faulted to ground)
+
+ The second of two blocks of output is the table of fault currents:
+
+ << Current in 1st Phase of Fault >> << Current in 2nd Phase of Fault >> << Current in 3rd Phase of Fault >>
+Fault Node Fault current Angle in Node Fault current Angle in Node Fault current Angle in
+number name magnitude degrees name magnitude degrees name magnitude degrees
+ 1 M-A .06666666667 90. M-B .06666666667 -30. M-C .06666666667 -150.
+ 2 1-A .06179153389 69.31714304 1-B .06022731205 -50.5641964 1-C .05941275365 -171.215847
+ 3 2-A .05208219619 53.62523447 2-B .05015996695 -66.4921925 2-C .04949163745 173.4660183
+ 4 4-A .03592866388 35.32657231 4-B .03411100322 -84.6521844 4-C .03393334197 155.903119
+ 5 7-A .02302145842 23.41165559 7-B .02187391516 -96.3255496 7-C .02206682532 144.3138124
+ 6 11-A .01341566059 8.497993142 11-B .01437596994 -100.647409 11-C .01485290881 136.1686199
+ 2-A .01121324483 88.26381507
+ 7 18-A .00946790732 12.03744642 18-B .00947195967 -107.725894 18-C .00943977544 132.1805708
+ 8 18-A .00176246418 99.26050076
+ 9 18-B .00178093781 -19.2144677
+ 10 18-C .00174761465 -140.302677
+ 11 18-A .00176246418 99.26050076
+ 12 18-B .00178093781 -19.2144677
+ 13 18-C .00174761465 -140.302677
+ 14 7-A .02302145842 23.41165559 7-B .02187391516 -96.3255496 7-C .02206682532 144.3138124
+BEGIN NEW DATA CASE
+C 4th of 5 subcases has the same solution as the 1st. It differs in that
+C the phasor [Y] is contained on branch cards that were punched by DC-9.
+C Note that $VINTAGE, 1 is required here. Of the 3 alternative precisions,
+C this is the middle; this is the default on punched cards (of DC-9) now as
+C the 4th and 5th subcases are being added 10 August 2009. The 1st subcase
+C continues to use the old narrow format ($VINTAGE, 0) as constructed by
+C hand many years ago. It is a part of history. For the 3rd alternative,
+C which is maximum precision, see the following 5th subcase. WSM.
+ 0.0 0.0 60. { Note XOPT = 60 here --- never actually used
+ 1 1
+$UNITS, .1591549431, 0.0, { Ensures no scaling of [Y] in mhos. XOPT = 1/(2*Pi)
+$VINTAGE, 1, { Of 3 widths, this is intermediate, requiring FORMAT ( 2E16.0 )
+51RA1 GA1 .48444770295E-8 .12281121515E-3
+52RB1 GB1 -.1296675794E-6 -.2242269696E-4
+ .00944175322745 -.0257399002302
+53RC1 GC1 .43614506152E-7 -.1462537283E-4
+ -.0084632380894 .01672909357449
+ .01659497249359 -.0474759779044
+54 -.1496688542E-6 -.9426424776E-5
+ .0187136308212 -.0503014889342
+ -.014459054142 .0240975756066
+ .04631483359448 -.0115611698646
+55 .14960460152E-5 .64589654581E-5
+ -.0168059853862 .05971717826772
+ .01897469864841 -.0424555556429
+ -.0327145752086 .03047566556754
+ .03607139971436 -.0606204446839
+56 .11898901751E-5 .44856452772E-5
+ .00209415334953 -.0206268928201
+ -.0022406862695 .0368952787805
+ .00366143779662 -.0653239407336
+ -.2258503629E-4 .02742503620834
+ .00485408284636 .00993930807034
+$UNITS, 60., 0.0, { Restore original values; "CIMAGE" ends scaling XUNITS = 1.
+BLANK card ending branch cards
+BLANK card ending non-existent switch cards
+14GA1 424.35 60. 0.0 -.1
+14RA1 424.35 60. 10.0 -.1
+14GB1 424.35 60. -120.0 -.1
+14RB1 424.35 60. -110.0 -.1
+14GC1 424.35 60. 120.0 -.1
+14RC1 424.35 60. 130.0 -.1
+BLANK card ending source cards
+-5RA1 GA1 RB1 GB1 { Mar, 95. Illustrate 2 phasor branch voltage outputs
+C 1st branch: RA1 417.90316999073 424.35 -.0131358847789 .05382578725921 -.8215796220638 7289.7633561218
+C 1st branch: 73.687604192962 10.0000000 .05219831324046 104.1253709 -11.39089622483 -948.6137732
+C Last injection: GC1 -212.175 424.35 -12.95674346031 44.41911058471 -6432.468410608 9424.6247883109
+C Last injection: 367.49788009593 120.0000000 -42.4874120657 -106.9593405 -6888.171204825 -0.6825172
+BLANK card ending output requests
+ PRINTER PLOT
+BLANK card ending non-existent plot cards
+BEGIN NEW DATA CASE
+C 5th of 5 subcases has the same solution as the 4th. It differs in that
+C the phasor [Y] is what would be produced by DC-9 if that $VINTAGE, 2,
+C data card were uncommented. For 64-bit computation, precision is full.
+C Note that the same $VINTAGE, 2 request of DC-9 is required here, too.
+ 0.0 0.0 60. { Note XOPT = 60 here --- never actually used
+ 1 1
+$UNITS, .1591549431, 0.0, { Ensures no scaling of [Y] in mhos. XOPT = 1/(2*Pi)
+$VINTAGE, 2, { Of 3 alternatives, this is widest, requiring FORMAT ( 2E27.0 )
+51RA1 GA1 4.8444770277573491700E-09 1.2281121515163583300E-04
+52RB1 GB1 -1.2966757938532132400E-07 -2.2422696957929919700E-05
+ 9.4417532274453028200E-03 -2.5739900230249322700E-02
+53RC1 GC1 4.3614506153007997000E-08 -1.4625372832163987600E-05
+ -8.4632380893781746600E-03 1.6729093574486542100E-02
+ 1.6594972493589866400E-02 -4.7475977904406906100E-02
+54 -1.4966885422339314900E-07 -9.4264247756427733400E-06
+ 1.8713630821201195800E-02 -5.0301488934157152800E-02
+ -1.4459054141970184600E-02 2.4097575606600894100E-02
+ 4.6314833594475780800E-02 -1.1561169864637796700E-02
+55 1.4960460151833065100E-06 6.4589654580511652000E-06
+ -1.6805985386192243800E-02 5.9717178267722430300E-02
+ 1.8974698648408130900E-02 -4.2455555642932338300E-02
+ -3.2714575208587087800E-02 3.0475665567539195200E-02
+ 3.6071399714361830600E-02 -6.0620444683943348900E-02
+56 1.1898901751368022500E-06 4.4856452772413896800E-06
+ 2.0941533495336460200E-03 -2.0626892820102635900E-02
+ -2.2406862694774026100E-03 3.6895278780495553700E-02
+ 3.6614377966236264600E-03 -6.5323940733637467200E-02
+ -2.2585036293308193800E-05 2.7425036208339411600E-02
+ 4.8540828463550763200E-03 9.9393080703350303300E-03
+$UNITS, 60., 0.0, { Restore original values; "CIMAGE" ends scaling XUNITS = 1.
+BLANK card ending branch cards
+C To show the effect of precision, consider P-loss for the 3 subcases. There
+C is little difference between 2E16.0 data (subcase 4) and 2E27.0 (subcase 5).
+C But for subcase 1, with [R] limited to E6.2, loss differs in the 3rd digit:
+C 1: Total network loss P-loss by summing injections = 9.326316227367E+03
+C 4: Total network loss P-loss by summing injections = 9.311041032869E+03
+C 5: Total network loss P-loss by summing injections = 9.311041032866E+03
+C This is using Salford ATP. WSM. 10 August 2009
+BLANK card ending non-existent switch cards
+14GA1 424.35 60. 0.0 -.1
+14RA1 424.35 60. 10.0 -.1
+14GB1 424.35 60. -120.0 -.1
+14RB1 424.35 60. -110.0 -.1
+14GC1 424.35 60. 120.0 -.1
+14RC1 424.35 60. 130.0 -.1
+BLANK card ending source cards
+-5RA1 GA1 RB1 GB1 { Mar, 95. Illustrate 2 phasor branch voltage outputs
+C 1st branch: RA1 417.90316999073 424.35 -.0131358847775 .05382578725998 -.821579621738 7289.7633561257
+C 1st branch: 73.687604192962 10.0000000 .0521983132416 104.1253709 -11.39089622502 -948.6137732
+C Last injection: GC1 -212.175 424.35 -12.95674346031 44.419110584718 -6432.468410609 9424.6247883126
+C Last injection: 367.49788009593 120.0000000 -42.48741206571 -106.9593405 -6888.171204826 -0.6825172
+BLANK card ending output requests
+ PRINTER PLOT
+BLANK card ending non-existent plot cards
+BEGIN NEW DATA CASE
+BLANK
|