From b18347ffc9db9641e215995edea1c04c363b2bdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Angelo Rossi Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:04:16 +0000 Subject: Initial commit. --- benchmarks/dc11.dat | 409 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 409 insertions(+) create mode 100644 benchmarks/dc11.dat (limited to 'benchmarks/dc11.dat') diff --git a/benchmarks/dc11.dat b/benchmarks/dc11.dat new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ec8c5be --- /dev/null +++ b/benchmarks/dc11.dat @@ -0,0 +1,409 @@ +BEGIN NEW DATA CASE +C BENCHMARK DC-11 +C Illustration of data input using [Y]. Matrix comes from DC-9 (or +C more precisely, DCPRINT-25, since DIAGNOSTIC is needed to see it). +C Solution is close to DC-9 (remember limited input [Y] precision). +C Note two $UNITS cards. The 2nd, returning to original XOPT and +C COPT, does nothing, since all data input is completed. But the 1st +C is mandatory whenever [Y] input is used, so input [Y] in mhos will +C be loaded into List-3 tables TR and TX without any scaling. COPT is +C not used, so it can be anything (zero is used below). But XOPT must +C equal the reciprocal of 2 * Pi, since the scaling factor for [L] is +C 2 * Pi times this frequency (.1591549431) in Hz --- which is unity. +C There are 5 stacked subcases. The 4th & 5th are related to this 1st. + 0.0 0.0 60. { Note XOPT = 60 here --- never actually used + 1 1 +C New XOPT, COPT = 1.59154943E-01 0.00000000E+00 |$UNITS, .1591549431, 0.0, +C 1st of coupled R-L. 4.80000E-09 1.22811E-04 |51RA1 GA1 4 +C -1.000E-07-2.242E-05 9.440E-03-2.574E-02 9.440E-03|52RB1 GB1 - +C 4.300E-08-1.463E-05-8.500E-03 1.673E-02 1.660E-02|53RC1 GC1 4 +C -1.000E-07-9.426E-06 1.871E-02-5.030E-02-1.450E-02|54 - +C 4.631E-02-1.156E-02 3.250E-03-8.199E-02 4.631E-02| . +C 1.500E-06 6.459E-06-1.680E-02 5.972E-02 1.897E-02|55 1 +C -3.270E-02 3.048E-02 3.607E-02-6.062E-02 3.607E-02| - +C 1.200E-06 4.486E-06 2.090E-03-2.063E-02-2.200E-03|56 1 +C 3.660E-03-6.532E-02-2.000E-05 2.742E-02 4.850E-03| . +C New XOPT, COPT = 6.00000000E+01 0.00000000E+00 |$UNITS, 60., 0.0, { Restore +$UNITS, .1591549431, 0.0, { Ensures no scaling of [Y] in mhos. XOPT = 1/(2*Pi) +51RA1 GA1 4.8E-9 1.22811E-04 { 1st row of 6x6 [Y] in mhos +52RB1 GB1 -1.E-7-2.24227E-05.00944-2.57399E-02 +53RC1 GC1 4.3E-8-1.46254E-05-.0085 1.67291E-02.01660-4.74760E-02 +54 -1.E-7-9.42642E-06.01871-5.03015E-02-.0145 2.40976E-02 + .04631-1.15612E-02 +55 1.5E-6 6.45897E-06-.0168 5.97172E-02.01897-4.24556E-02 + -.0327 3.04757E-02.03607-6.06204E-02 +56 1.2E-6 4.48565E-06.00209-2.06269E-02-.0022 3.68953E-02 + .00366-6.53239E-02-2.E-5 2.74250E-02.00485 9.93931E-03 +$UNITS, 60., 0.0, { Restore original values; "CIMAGE" ends scaling XUNITS = 1. +BLANK card ending branch cards +BLANK card ending non-existent switch cards +14GA1 424.35 60. 0.0 -.1 +14RA1 424.35 60. 10.0 -.1 +14GB1 424.35 60. -120.0 -.1 +14RB1 424.35 60. -110.0 -.1 +14GC1 424.35 60. 120.0 -.1 +14RC1 424.35 60. 130.0 -.1 +C --------------+------------------------------ +C From bus name | Names of all adjacent busses. +C --------------+------------------------------ +C RA1 |GA1 * +C GA1 |RA1 * +C RB1 |GB1 * +C GB1 |RB1 * +C RC1 |GC1 * +C GC1 |RC1 * +C --------------+------------------------------ +BLANK card ending source cards +C Total network loss P-loss by summing injections = 9.326316227367E+03 +C End injection: -12.96755041034 44.410354381177 -6429.033843309 9422.7669408263 +C End injection: -42.47495983067 -106.9773628 -6888.835943954 -0.6822873 +-5RA1 GA1 RB1 GB1 { Mar, 95. Illustrate 2 phasor branch voltage outputs +BLANK card ending output requests + PRINTER PLOT +BLANK card ending non-existent plot cards +BEGIN NEW DATA CASE +C 2nd of 5 subcases will illustrate the request for an exact Pi-equivalent +C to represent constant-parameter distributed lines in the phasor solution. +C Data is from BENCHMARK DCPRINT-1, from which the permanently-closed switch +C was removed to simplify. The solution is just a little different. To see +C this, look at generator inject (compare with following lumped-R solution): +C SEND 100. 100. 1.1985672173179 1.9672525544427 +C 0.0 0.0 -1.559974114699 -52.4640241 +C Acknowledgement: Bob Meredith of New York Power Authority inspired the +C work of this feature by his studies involving phasor +C solutions at high frequencies (200 KHz) for power system +C carrier relaying. Bob found that using lumped R modeling +C gave quite erroneous results. WSM. March 25, 1989 +EXACT PHASOR EQUIVALENT { Switch from lumped-R to exact Pi-equiv. of distributed +PRINTED NUMBER WIDTH, 13, 2, { Request maximum precision (for 8 output columns) + .000100 .020 60. 60. + 1 1 1 1 1 -1 + 2 1 5 5 20 20 + REC .001 { Near short at receiving end to ground } 3 +-1SEND REC 0.3 0.4 12.6 100. { 1-phase distributed line +BLANK card ending branch cards +BLANK card ending switch cards +14SEND 100. 60. { 60-Hz phasor solution } -1. +BLANK card ending source cards +C SEND 100. 100. 1.2001187442482 1.966491078825 +C 0.0 0.0 -1.557819682377 -52.3899333 +C REC .00119991725341 .00201685894214 -1.199917253405 2.0168589421448 +C -.001621085617 -53.4913908 1.6210856169526 126.5086092 +C Total network loss P-loss by summing injections = 6.000593721241E+01 +C Solution at nodes with known voltage. Nodes that are shorted together by swi +C SEND 100. 100. 1.2001187442482 1.966491078825 +C 0.0 0.0 -1.557819682377 -52.3899333 +C Step Time REC REC SEND REC +C TERRA TERRA +C 0 0.0 .0011999173 .0011999173 100. 1.199917253 +C 1 .1E-3 .0012601784 .0012601784 99.92894726 1.260178379 +C 2 .2E-3 .0013186574 .0013186574 99.71589003 1.318657447 +C 3 .3E-3 .0013752626 .0013752626 99.36113105 1.375262631 + 1 { Request the output of all (here, only two) node voltages +C 200 .02 .0019139029 .0019139029 30.90169944 1.913902913 +C Variable maxima : .0020181823 .0020181823 100. 2.018182282 +C Times of maxima : .0025 .0025 0.0 .0025 +C Variable minima : -.002017382 -.002017382 -99.9921044 -2.01738187 +C Times of minima : .0108 .0108 .0083 .0108 + PRINTER PLOT +C If lumped R, the extrema change just a little: (-2.017, 2.017) + 194 4. 0.0 20. REC { Axis limits : (-2.017, 2.018) +$WIDTH, 80, { To compact the case-summary tables, switch to narrow output +BLANK card ending plot cards +BEGIN NEW DATA CASE +C 3rd of 5 subcases is unrelated to the preceding two. It will illustrate +C the use of EMTP to perform both single-phase and 3-phase faults to ground. +C The network is copied from DC-3. Usage began the 1st week of March, 1993. +$WIDTH, 132, { More than 80 columns are needed to see the 3-phase fault table +FAULTS TO GROUND { Declaration of intention to run a phasor fault study + M-A M-B M-C { 1st fault is 3-phase; we will short these nodes to ground + 1-A 1-B 1-C { 2nd fault is 3-phase. Etc. FORMAT is (2X, 13A6) with + 2-A 2-B 2-C { blank field ignored (names are on left only to look nice). + 4-A 4-B 4-C { There is one line per fault, which can involve a maximum + 7-A 7-B 7-C { of 13 nodes. + 11-A 11-B 11-C 2-A { 6th fault is 4-phase, to illustrate no limit < 14 +C Keep the 7th fault 3-phase. However, spread it over 2 data cards as an +C illustration of CONT. on the right edge. The former limit of 13 nodes +C per fault thus is expanded to 25 on 18 August 2005. The number of faults +C becomes unlimited at this time as SUBROUTINE FAULT is reprogrammed. WSM. +C 18-A 18-B 18-C { 7th fault is 3-phase + 18-A 18-B CONT. + 18-C { 7th fault is spread over 2 data cards by continuation request + 18-A { 8th fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-A is shorted). + 18-B { 9th fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-B is shorted). + 18-C { 10 fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-A is shorted). +C For 1, 2, ... 6 phases, it is possible to pack the fault names on input +C data cards. So, for example, there can be up to 13 single-phase faults, +C up to six 2-phase faults, up to four 3-phase faults, up to two 5- or 6-phase +C faults. For any one card, the 2 or more faults must be for the same number +C of phases --- the number that is declared on a ?-phase faults follow card +C that precedes it. The declared number of phases remains in effect until +C altered by another such declaration or End packing of 2 or more faults (to +C return to original, unpacked format). On any packed fault card, any one of +C the 2 or more data fields can be left blank. But not all can be left blank +C as this would serve to terminate the list of faults. So, an illustration. +C Let's repeat the 8th, 9th, and 10th faults immediately above. The preceding +C 3 separate cards can be replaced by the following packed, higher-level +C equivalent which is added by WSM on 19 August 2005 : +6-phase faults follow { Declare packing of 6-phase fault names, 2 per card +C In fact, no 6-phase fault will be illustrated, however. Think smaller: +1-phase faults follow { Declare packing of 1-phase fault names, 13 per card + 18-A 18-B 18-C { 11th, 12th, and 13th faults each are single-phase +C 7-phase faults follow { Illegal declaration of packing of 7-phase fault names +C The preceding halts execution, unfortunately, so it must be commented out. +End packing of 2 or more faults { Declare end of such card packing + 7-A 7-B 7-C { 14th fault is 3-phase to ground, identical to the 5th. +C Finally, illustrate the limit of 25 phases. This 15th fault is legal: + 18-A 18-B 17-A 17-B 16-A 16-B 15-A 15-B 14-A 14-B 13-A 13-B CONT. + 12-A 12-B 11-A 11-B 10-A 10-B 9-A 9-B 8-A 8-B 7-A 7-B 6-A +BLANK card ends list of faults (more accurately, nodes to be faulted to ground) + .000050 .010 3000. { DELTAT and TMAX of this card will be ignored + 1 1 1 1 1 { All these integers will be ignored + 1M-A 1-A 34.372457.68.15781 + 2M-B 1-B 35.735164.43-.031538.002451.79.16587 + 3M-C 1-C 35.735164.43-.031537.455151.72-.021938.002451.79.16587 + 11-A 2-A M-A 1-A { Sections 2 through 18 are copies of the first + 21-B 2-B { which has just been inputted. + 31-C 2-C +C The following $LISTOFF and $LISTON are used to illustrate operation of +C this valuable feature within fault studies. One 3-phase Pi-circuit, from +C node 2 to node 3, will be missing in the output. +$LISTOFF + 12-A 3-A M-A 1-A + 22-B 3-B + 32-C 3-C +$LISTON + 13-A 4-A M-A 1-A + 23-B 4-B + 33-C 4-C + 14-A 5-A M-A 1-A + 24-B 5-B + 34-C 5-C + 15-A 6-A M-A 1-A + 25-B 6-B + 35-C 6-C + 16-C 7-C M-A 1-A { Note transposition: /C/A/B/ rather than /A/B/C + 26-A 7-A + 36-B 7-B + 17-C 8-C M-A 1-A + 27-A 8-A + 37-B 8-B + 18-C 9-C M-A 1-A + 28-A 9-A + 38-B 9-B + 19-C 10-C M-A 1-A + 29-A 10-A + 39-B 10-B + 110-C 11-C M-A 1-A + 210-A 11-A + 310-B 11-B + 111-C 12-C M-A 1-A + 211-A 12-A + 311-B 12-B + 112-B 13-B M-A 1-A { Note 2nd transposition: /B/C/A/ rather than /C/A/B + 212-C 13-C + 312-A 13-A + 113-B 14-B M-A 1-A + 213-C 14-C + 313-A 14-A + 114-B 15-B M-A 1-A + 214-C 15-C + 314-A 15-A + 115-B 16-B M-A 1-A + 215-C 16-C + 315-A 16-A + 116-B 17-B M-A 1-A + 216-C 17-C + 316-A 17-A + 117-B 18-B M-A 1-A + 217-C 18-C + 317-A 18-A +$BEGIN PL4 COMMENTS +C Copy the structure as illustrated in DC-3. Prior to 10 June 2004, this +C data would produce an error halt because FTG required 2 cells in CIMAGE +C for each fault. This is for fixed KRDPL4(10). After 5 faults, the 10 +C cells would be filled. The complaint came from Anders Johnson, working +C with Dan Goldsworthy at BPA. Data was received 4 June 2004. Anders put +C his comment in the middle of his branch data. Curiously, if location was +C moved to the top (immediately after BNDC), the problem disappears. But it +C is simpler to protect against all locations by having FTP code of SUBR1 set +C KOMPL4 = 0 as each new fault begins. This standard test case is modified +C on 11 June 2004 to illustrate the problem for any executable version that +C was created prior to 10 June 2004. Note that ICAT of the integer misc. +C data card remains zero (unchanged). It is the use of PL4 comments that +C caused the problem, whether or not the user requested a .PL4 file to +C receive them. Except for this new data block in this one location, data +C is unchanged from the old DC-11, which had MS-DOS date 3-24-95. +$END PL4 COMMENTS + 0POLE-AM-A 15.0 + 0POLE-BM-B 15.0 + 0POLE-CM-C 15.0 +BLANK card ending branch cards + E-A POLE-A -1. 20.0 { 1st of 3 closed switches merely illustrate + E-B POLE-B -1. 20.0 { that such switches can coexist with this + E-C POLE-C -1. 20.0 { special usage of FAULTS TO GROUND. + 17-A 0.00998 20.0 { 1st of 3 open switches could be omitted + 17-B 0.013998 20.0 { without any change to solution. These + 17-C 0.013998 20.0 { illustrate a 2nd type of coexistance. +BLANK card ending switches +14E-A -1.0 60.0 -90.0 { Note we make T-start < 0 } -1. +14E-B -1.0 60.0 -210.0 { The fault study is driven} -1. +14E-C -1.0 60.0 30.0 { by such phasor sources. } -1. +BLANK card ending sources + + Note: The blank card ending sources is the last that actually will + be read and used. When the fault study is complete, the program + will skip to the BEGIN NEW DATA CASE card below for any possible + following subcase (none for this illustration). So, we can show + output here with no need for "C " in columns 1-2. There are two + blocks of special output beginning with the interpretation of + input data cards: + +Request preceding list of nodes to be faulted. |FAULTS TO GROUND { Declaration of intention to run a phasor fault study +Names of nodes for fault number 1. | M-A M-B M-C { 1st fault is 3-phase; we will short these nodes to ground +Names of nodes for fault number 2. | 1-A 1-B 1-C { 2nd fault is 3-phase. Etc. FORMAT is (2X, 13A6) with +Names of nodes for fault number 3. | 2-A 2-B 2-C { blank field ignored (names are on left only to look nice). +Names of nodes for fault number 4. | 4-A 4-B 4-C { There is one line per fault, which can involve a maximum +Names of nodes for fault number 5. | 7-A 7-B 7-C { of 13 nodes. +Names of nodes for fault number 6. | 11-A 11-B 11-C 2-A { 6th fault is 4-phase, to illustrate no limit < 14 +Names of nodes for fault number 7. | 18-A 18-B CONT. +Names of nodes for fault number 7. | 18-C { 7th fault is spread over 2 data cards by continuation request +Names of nodes for fault number 8. | 18-A { 8th fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-A is shorted). +Names of nodes for fault number 9. | 18-B { 9th fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-B is shorted). +Names of nodes for fault number 10. | 18-C { 10 fault is single-line-to-ground (node 18-A is shorted). +Pack multiple faults on a single input card. |6-phase faults follow { Declare packing of 6-phase fault names, 2 per card +Pack multiple faults on a single input card. |1-phase faults follow { Declare packing of 1-phase fault names, 13 per card +Names of nodes for fault number 11. | 18-A 18-B 18-C { 11th, 12th, and 13th faults each are single-phase +End packing of multiple faults on input cards. |End packing of 2 or more faults { Declare end of such card packing +Names of nodes for fault number 14. | 7-A 7-B 7-C { 14th fault is 3-phase to ground, identical to the 5th. +Blank card ending list of nodes to be faulted. |BLANK card ends list of faults (more accurately, nodes to be faulted to ground) + + The second of two blocks of output is the table of fault currents: + + << Current in 1st Phase of Fault >> << Current in 2nd Phase of Fault >> << Current in 3rd Phase of Fault >> +Fault Node Fault current Angle in Node Fault current Angle in Node Fault current Angle in +number name magnitude degrees name magnitude degrees name magnitude degrees + 1 M-A .06666666667 90. M-B .06666666667 -30. M-C .06666666667 -150. + 2 1-A .06179153389 69.31714304 1-B .06022731205 -50.5641964 1-C .05941275365 -171.215847 + 3 2-A .05208219619 53.62523447 2-B .05015996695 -66.4921925 2-C .04949163745 173.4660183 + 4 4-A .03592866388 35.32657231 4-B .03411100322 -84.6521844 4-C .03393334197 155.903119 + 5 7-A .02302145842 23.41165559 7-B .02187391516 -96.3255496 7-C .02206682532 144.3138124 + 6 11-A .01341566059 8.497993142 11-B .01437596994 -100.647409 11-C .01485290881 136.1686199 + 2-A .01121324483 88.26381507 + 7 18-A .00946790732 12.03744642 18-B .00947195967 -107.725894 18-C .00943977544 132.1805708 + 8 18-A .00176246418 99.26050076 + 9 18-B .00178093781 -19.2144677 + 10 18-C .00174761465 -140.302677 + 11 18-A .00176246418 99.26050076 + 12 18-B .00178093781 -19.2144677 + 13 18-C .00174761465 -140.302677 + 14 7-A .02302145842 23.41165559 7-B .02187391516 -96.3255496 7-C .02206682532 144.3138124 +BEGIN NEW DATA CASE +C 4th of 5 subcases has the same solution as the 1st. It differs in that +C the phasor [Y] is contained on branch cards that were punched by DC-9. +C Note that $VINTAGE, 1 is required here. Of the 3 alternative precisions, +C this is the middle; this is the default on punched cards (of DC-9) now as +C the 4th and 5th subcases are being added 10 August 2009. The 1st subcase +C continues to use the old narrow format ($VINTAGE, 0) as constructed by +C hand many years ago. It is a part of history. For the 3rd alternative, +C which is maximum precision, see the following 5th subcase. WSM. + 0.0 0.0 60. { Note XOPT = 60 here --- never actually used + 1 1 +$UNITS, .1591549431, 0.0, { Ensures no scaling of [Y] in mhos. XOPT = 1/(2*Pi) +$VINTAGE, 1, { Of 3 widths, this is intermediate, requiring FORMAT ( 2E16.0 ) +51RA1 GA1 .48444770295E-8 .12281121515E-3 +52RB1 GB1 -.1296675794E-6 -.2242269696E-4 + .00944175322745 -.0257399002302 +53RC1 GC1 .43614506152E-7 -.1462537283E-4 + -.0084632380894 .01672909357449 + .01659497249359 -.0474759779044 +54 -.1496688542E-6 -.9426424776E-5 + .0187136308212 -.0503014889342 + -.014459054142 .0240975756066 + .04631483359448 -.0115611698646 +55 .14960460152E-5 .64589654581E-5 + -.0168059853862 .05971717826772 + .01897469864841 -.0424555556429 + -.0327145752086 .03047566556754 + .03607139971436 -.0606204446839 +56 .11898901751E-5 .44856452772E-5 + .00209415334953 -.0206268928201 + -.0022406862695 .0368952787805 + .00366143779662 -.0653239407336 + -.2258503629E-4 .02742503620834 + .00485408284636 .00993930807034 +$UNITS, 60., 0.0, { Restore original values; "CIMAGE" ends scaling XUNITS = 1. +BLANK card ending branch cards +BLANK card ending non-existent switch cards +14GA1 424.35 60. 0.0 -.1 +14RA1 424.35 60. 10.0 -.1 +14GB1 424.35 60. -120.0 -.1 +14RB1 424.35 60. -110.0 -.1 +14GC1 424.35 60. 120.0 -.1 +14RC1 424.35 60. 130.0 -.1 +BLANK card ending source cards +-5RA1 GA1 RB1 GB1 { Mar, 95. Illustrate 2 phasor branch voltage outputs +C 1st branch: RA1 417.90316999073 424.35 -.0131358847789 .05382578725921 -.8215796220638 7289.7633561218 +C 1st branch: 73.687604192962 10.0000000 .05219831324046 104.1253709 -11.39089622483 -948.6137732 +C Last injection: GC1 -212.175 424.35 -12.95674346031 44.41911058471 -6432.468410608 9424.6247883109 +C Last injection: 367.49788009593 120.0000000 -42.4874120657 -106.9593405 -6888.171204825 -0.6825172 +BLANK card ending output requests + PRINTER PLOT +BLANK card ending non-existent plot cards +BEGIN NEW DATA CASE +C 5th of 5 subcases has the same solution as the 4th. It differs in that +C the phasor [Y] is what would be produced by DC-9 if that $VINTAGE, 2, +C data card were uncommented. For 64-bit computation, precision is full. +C Note that the same $VINTAGE, 2 request of DC-9 is required here, too. + 0.0 0.0 60. { Note XOPT = 60 here --- never actually used + 1 1 +$UNITS, .1591549431, 0.0, { Ensures no scaling of [Y] in mhos. XOPT = 1/(2*Pi) +$VINTAGE, 2, { Of 3 alternatives, this is widest, requiring FORMAT ( 2E27.0 ) +51RA1 GA1 4.8444770277573491700E-09 1.2281121515163583300E-04 +52RB1 GB1 -1.2966757938532132400E-07 -2.2422696957929919700E-05 + 9.4417532274453028200E-03 -2.5739900230249322700E-02 +53RC1 GC1 4.3614506153007997000E-08 -1.4625372832163987600E-05 + -8.4632380893781746600E-03 1.6729093574486542100E-02 + 1.6594972493589866400E-02 -4.7475977904406906100E-02 +54 -1.4966885422339314900E-07 -9.4264247756427733400E-06 + 1.8713630821201195800E-02 -5.0301488934157152800E-02 + -1.4459054141970184600E-02 2.4097575606600894100E-02 + 4.6314833594475780800E-02 -1.1561169864637796700E-02 +55 1.4960460151833065100E-06 6.4589654580511652000E-06 + -1.6805985386192243800E-02 5.9717178267722430300E-02 + 1.8974698648408130900E-02 -4.2455555642932338300E-02 + -3.2714575208587087800E-02 3.0475665567539195200E-02 + 3.6071399714361830600E-02 -6.0620444683943348900E-02 +56 1.1898901751368022500E-06 4.4856452772413896800E-06 + 2.0941533495336460200E-03 -2.0626892820102635900E-02 + -2.2406862694774026100E-03 3.6895278780495553700E-02 + 3.6614377966236264600E-03 -6.5323940733637467200E-02 + -2.2585036293308193800E-05 2.7425036208339411600E-02 + 4.8540828463550763200E-03 9.9393080703350303300E-03 +$UNITS, 60., 0.0, { Restore original values; "CIMAGE" ends scaling XUNITS = 1. +BLANK card ending branch cards +C To show the effect of precision, consider P-loss for the 3 subcases. There +C is little difference between 2E16.0 data (subcase 4) and 2E27.0 (subcase 5). +C But for subcase 1, with [R] limited to E6.2, loss differs in the 3rd digit: +C 1: Total network loss P-loss by summing injections = 9.326316227367E+03 +C 4: Total network loss P-loss by summing injections = 9.311041032869E+03 +C 5: Total network loss P-loss by summing injections = 9.311041032866E+03 +C This is using Salford ATP. WSM. 10 August 2009 +BLANK card ending non-existent switch cards +14GA1 424.35 60. 0.0 -.1 +14RA1 424.35 60. 10.0 -.1 +14GB1 424.35 60. -120.0 -.1 +14RB1 424.35 60. -110.0 -.1 +14GC1 424.35 60. 120.0 -.1 +14RC1 424.35 60. 130.0 -.1 +BLANK card ending source cards +-5RA1 GA1 RB1 GB1 { Mar, 95. Illustrate 2 phasor branch voltage outputs +C 1st branch: RA1 417.90316999073 424.35 -.0131358847775 .05382578725998 -.821579621738 7289.7633561257 +C 1st branch: 73.687604192962 10.0000000 .0521983132416 104.1253709 -11.39089622502 -948.6137732 +C Last injection: GC1 -212.175 424.35 -12.95674346031 44.419110584718 -6432.468410609 9424.6247883126 +C Last injection: 367.49788009593 120.0000000 -42.48741206571 -106.9593405 -6888.171204826 -0.6825172 +BLANK card ending output requests + PRINTER PLOT +BLANK card ending non-existent plot cards +BEGIN NEW DATA CASE +BLANK -- cgit v1.2.3